|
Accessible
|
Available to anyone with knowledge about a policy area and/or potentially affected by a policy
|
|
Accountability
|
One of four key principles in context of copyright policy consultations
|
|
Align
|
When different ideas, points of view or actions fit together or complement each other
|
|
Analysis
|
Approach to interpreting data in relation to a particular objective.
|
|
Balance
|
Ensuring no one perspective dominates consultations and different views are considered in reltaio to each other
|
|
Barrier of participation
|
An obstacle that limits the ability to participate in consultations
|
|
Benchmark/Yardstick
|
A standard used as a point of reference to evaluate performance
|
|
Components
|
The parts that make up the principles underpinning the consultation process
|
|
Concise
|
Brief but comprehensive
|
|
Consultation methods or practices
|
The different activities that make up consultation processes
|
|
Dialogue
|
An exchange of views characterized by mutual respect, openness and reflexivity
|
|
Deliberative
|
An approach to dialogue that is inclusive, equitable, and characterized by mutual respect among participants
|
|
Economic value and impact
|
Anticipated or actual effects of copyright policy decisions on economic outcomes such as industry profits, or contribution to national income
|
|
Evidence
|
Data or information about the consultation topic
|
|
Evidentiary standard
|
The quality standard for evidence to be taken into account in a consultation
|
|
Format-shift
|
Converting a creative work (e.g. a song) from one media format to another (e.g. from a CD to a cassette tape)
|
|
Implement/implementation
|
Putting ideas into action
|
|
Influence
|
Ability to affect policy outcomes
|
|
Interests
|
The reasons why stakeholders engage in consultations about copyright
|
|
Justification
|
Explanations of evidence, processes, decisions and final outcomes
|
|
Legitimacy
|
The authority associated with consultations by stakeholders
|
|
Locus of accountability
|
The person, group or organisation responsible for a decision or outcome
|
|
Material resources
|
Assets of value in a consultation (e.g. finance, access to experts, time)
|
|
Mutual understanding
|
When stakeholders understand each others’ views as well as their own
|
|
Non-economic
|
Aspects of life that are not directly economic – for example, culture, wellbeing, social relationships
|
|
Orphan work
|
Copyright-protected work for which rightsholders cannot be found
|
|
Participatory parity
|
Stakeholders enjoy equal resources and recognition to participate meaningfully in consultations
|
|
Policymakers
|
People in government whose main responsibility is making policy
|
|
Recognition
|
Respect offered to stakeholders as valid contributors to consultations
|
|
Regulative ideals
|
Ideal characteristics of consultations that also act as standards for evaluating consultations
|
|
Scrutiny
|
Critical and detailed evaluation
|
|
Stakeholders
|
Groups, organisations or individuals potentially affected by a policy or with an interest in a policy
|
|
Structural issues
|
Different aspects of the way society and politics are organized that affect consultations
|
|
Symbolic
|
Done only for appearance or out of obligation, but without any genuine impact
|
|
Systems-level
|
A perspective of consultation that considers the overall mix of activities involved
|
|
Social and public value
|
Non-economic value created for society as a whole
|
|
Transparency
|
Openness and honesty from government and stakeholders about different aspects of consultations (e.g decision-making, analysis, funding sources)
|
|
Targeting (stakeholders)
|
Communicating in ways specifically designed to reach particular stakeholders
|
|
Tension
|
When different ideas or activities are in conflict with each othe
|